Over 59558
politifake

Obi Politics


ZE BOOBIES - I gropes zem like zis




THE IRS - THEY TAKE FROM THE WORKING TO GIVE TO THE WANTING.




IRAQ - Individual experiences may vary




Liberal Idiots -




ROMNEY HOOD - Steals from the poor to give to the rich.




Batman's Thoughts on Hillary -




CPAC - TOLERANCE HELL ! - Get ready to hand out the torches and pitchforks! Homophobia rules!


TAGS: lgbt portman cpac homophobia
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

crankyhead - March 16, 2013, 6:41 pm
Fox, is there an echo in here, or do you carry one around with you, wherever you go?
foxrecon19d - March 16, 2013, 4:20 pm
Said the Obama worshipping sycophant who constantly whines about "government manufactured crisis"


A LONG TIME AGO, IN A GALAXY FAR, FAR FROM THE TRUTH... -




NARCISSISM -




Don't blame me for my politics. -


TAGS: tea party conservatives bible homophobia
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - July 14, 2014, 10:28 am
The power of the biblical force field.


Homophobia -




WHO AM I? -


TAGS: exxonmobil corporate personhood
Rating: 2.45/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 8:47 pm

Obviously I haven't considered every angle, but why not?...we sponsor kids that are good enough to play in our league, but it's the exposure that draws them, not the money.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 8:45 pm
I dunno, say he wanted to come for the exposure.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 8:36 pm

I guess so, But why would a 15 year old come here to play junior hockey? Remember (in my imaginary hockey utopia) the money isn't worth coming here for. I guess we could sponsor kids from other countries.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 8:27 pm
Subsidy: a financial aid supplied by a government, as to industry, for reasons of public welfare, the balance of payments, etc. So obviously, only those tax remittances that go back to the company in the form of a**istance, are called subsidies, Groucho.
GrouchoMarxist - October 8, 2012, 7:19 pm
This a cranky "Punked Alert" Expect more strawmen, non answers and loads of "What ifs"
GrouchoMarxist - October 8, 2012, 7:17 pm
So any tax for doing business is a subsidy if you're an oil company... s****** the koolaide
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 7:16 pm
So a 15 year old Finnish kid, say, would have to apply for dual citizenship, before he could play in your league?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 7:14 pm
Your mom said; "As soon as you start finishing your vegetables." =)
GrouchoMarxist - October 8, 2012, 6:55 pm
I wonder when I'll get my subsidy?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:35 pm

As long as you're a citizen.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:32 pm
So, are there no foreign born players in your league, or did I read that wrong?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:32 pm

Hockey should be about hockey and playing with the Americans has made hockey about money.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:28 pm

I could have worded that better. I want out of the NHL, I want big Canadian cities to have teams and one western and one eastern junior leagues to feed the CHL (Canadian hockey league) players.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:23 pm
OHL, WHL, QMJHL...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:18 pm

I want Provincial teams with $150,000 a year salary caps......That would be promoting Canadian culture.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:16 pm
Yes. The NHL is a mess. 3 lockouts in 17 years. Ugh. The fans need a union. =)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:14 pm

Don't get me wrong. I love the sport, just not the mess that the NHL has become. I still cheer for team Canada.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:10 pm

Kind of of like what Toronto does to Northern Ontario.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:09 pm

I do hate hockey, And I'm not a big fan of Winnipeg. They make decisions that affect the entire province, but they've forgotten that there are people outside the perimeter highway.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:05 pm
LOL! As if you didn't want the WPGJets back. I know you don't like hockey, but come on man.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:04 pm
On this issue, I'm confident with the word 'never'.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:03 pm

I also didn't want the WPG Jets back. (:
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:02 pm

That was in response to the jets. I'd have to read up about the crime bill. But I know we could use a few new prisons in Manitoba.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:00 pm

Never say never, But you're probably right. Of course it's a waste of money.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:59 pm
Or the Omnibus crime bill expenses? Building jails we don't need to house criminals that don't exist, wouldn't we be saving more money there?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:57 pm
What's your position on that new fleet of F-35's that Harper wants to buy? Isn't that a bit more frivolous a pricetag than the CBC, considering we'll never have to use them?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:56 pm

You know I don't back a party. I refuse to chose between 2 groups of morons. I take every issue as a solitary entity and make my decision.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:49 pm
That last sentence was sarcasm. =)
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:49 pm
I know, right? Remember back when the Liberal party of Canada posted 10 straight years (1998-2008) of budget surpluses under Chretien and Martin? Those were the days, huh? Good thing we've gone back in the red with the Conservative Harper. =)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:39 pm

Or it's a billion dollars a year off the top of a $591,344,594,012.45 debt (as of Sept 21st) It all depends on what you see as more important. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:32 pm
That's a 9 cent a day per capita investment, to not have our culture a**imilated. I'm fine with it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:31 pm

Like I said, Try watching CBC TV.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:31 pm

I don't think that the CBC provides $1,000,000,000 a year worth of culture.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:27 pm
This brings us back to the 'Kardashian' argument. The CBC promotes Canadian culture. That's a service, as a Canadian, that I enjoy.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:26 pm

I said it was OK to hold them to different standards because one is a necessary evil the other is just evil. I'm just being practical.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:25 pm

we don't need the CBC.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:24 pm

And I already told you I don't agree with subsidizing oil companies...In fact, they should be paying us for the privilege. But the CBC does nothing for us, and oil companies are used to getting handouts. The difference is that we need oil companies.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:22 pm
...and another way for those guys.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:22 pm
Otherwise, we're making these judgements based on favoring one product or service over another. Either companies can sustain themselves, or they can't. We either pick socialism, or we pick free market capitalism. It can't be one way for these guys...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:22 pm

They definitely wouldn't get away with spending public money on p***ography.http://www.torontosun.com/2012/02/02/cbc-doubles-down-on-p***ography
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:19 pm
I totally understand your point Moo. Yes, 5 is half of 10. What I'm driving at here is that if we're going to argue that one company should get 5, because it is half of 10, than this should apply to all companies, big oil included.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:19 pm

I'd be OK with keeping the Radio stations. But do me a favour, Go home tonight and watch CBC television. Come back tomorrow and tell me if we need that.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:18 pm
The CBC is a by product of the CRTC and the Canadian Broadcasting Act, is it not? SunMedia, as a private entity, aren't held to the same content criteria as the CBC, are they?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:17 pm

And 5 is still half of 10. I said I didn't agree with giving them anything. But I'm not even going to hope for that....too many bleeding hearts in our country.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:15 pm
Fair enough, but SunMedia is owned by a much larger corporate entity, and the protection of that corporate umbrella gives SunMedia access to capital that is being subsidized by other sectors. The CBC isn't in the wireless telephone market, for example.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:12 pm
You can call it whatever you want to, but a tax break, is a subsidy, is a handout.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:12 pm

But it's better than nothing.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:11 pm

Everyone needs entertainment that doesn't include the Kardashians, Privatize the CBC and give them the same breaks as Sunmedia. Bingo!, we just saved %500 million dollars a year. I don't even like that solution.....
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:09 pm

Yes, which is why I mentioned my distaste for them. and they have received help from the government, but not the 500 million that the CBC claimed. They got breaks, not handouts.I don't agree with that either.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:03 pm
The CBC provides Canadian content to the public airwaves. There needs to be at least a couple of stations up here that aren't addicted to the Kardashian sisters, no? =)
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:02 pm
Isn't SunMedia owned by Quebecor?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:43 pm

And yes, I understand that the sun network is disgusting and right wing. but at least we're not giving the a billion dollars for stale entertainment.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:42 pm

What is the CBC providing?...........This is an old article, but it's a good example of the cbc's entitled attitude.http://www.torontosun.com/2011/10/19/cbc-lashes-out-over-scrutiny-of-spending
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:41 pm

Correction, We just slashed %10 from their budget. Good job conservative government. (I'll never say good Job Steve)
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:38 pm
Cheers moo, I'd appreciate reading that.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:38 pm
Companies provide goods and services to the market place. That's the comparison. Just because they provide different goods and services, doesn't mean they should operate by a different set of rules. It's the same argument.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:37 pm

I'll find the Sun article about french vs english channel spending by the CBC....It doesn't seem to be on their website anymore.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:36 pm

Why do you have to make any comparison to oil companies? It's a simple question, Is the CBC worth a billion dollars in tax money every year?......NO. Is PBS worth 500 million to the Americans? ..No. Oil subsidies are a different argument.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:29 pm
...sets of rules for different sectors, than why are you angry about there being different sets of rules for different sectors? Is it that you just don't like the goods and services offered by french language television? Because that's not an excuse.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:28 pm
If you're saying that you can hold different sectors to different rules, but at the same time, you're complaining about a perceived 'french programming bias' on the CBC, I'm not sure I understand your argument. If you're not angry about different sets...
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:26 pm
So, it's your opinion, that public broadcasting is COMPLETELY irrelevant?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:25 pm
I listen to CBC radio more than I watch CBCTV, to be honest. Can you cite a source that shows the budgetary bias in the CBC towards french language programming? I'd be interested to see it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:25 pm

No, I don't want my taxes subsidizing oil companies. and yes, you can hold different sectors to different rules. If one sector is COMPLETELY irrelevant.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:23 pm
Either every company gets to benefit from tax incentives/credits/subsidies, or none of them do. It's either socialism or it's free market enterprise. It can't be one way for some, and the other way for others. You see what I mean?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:23 pm

Do you watch the cbc?....We spend as much on french programming as we do on English, Is the country %50 French? Last year we paid for the french to buy softcore p*** from France and put it on a public network.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:21 pm
This is the disconnect I'm trying to illustrate. You can't hold one sector accountable to a different set of rules, simply because you don't like what goods and services that sector is offering.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:19 pm
Fine. You don't want your taces supporting the CBC. Great. How do you feel about your tax dollars supporting Petro Canada? Or worse, how do you feel about foreign oil companies getting tax subsidies in Canada?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:17 pm
A bias towards the french? What are you talking about?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:16 pm

The only thing I hate more is Manitoba public insurance....Be glad you live in a province with private insurance. Because we're getting f***ed hard.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:14 pm

We spend more than a billion dollars a year to watch reruns of crap that were made in the 70's. Add a bias toward the french, and it's a God d*** national tragedy.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:09 pm

Personally, I don't want my tax dollars supporting the CBC, and If I were American I think I'd feel the same about PBS. If these shows are so great, then they'd do just fine on a privately owned and funded network.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 3:46 pm
If both companies are receiving federal aid in order to survive, then both should be subject to the same criticism about receiving that aid, no? Or is big oil just simply too big to be criticized?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 3:44 pm
... excuse me, people.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 3:43 pm
Of course I support the CBC. I'm trying to illustrate the disconnect that exists in the conservative mindset, when they jump up and down and stamp their feet in anger over one company being subsidized, but remain eerily silent for other corporations,...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 2:09 pm

So, Do you agree with the money our government spends on the CBC?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:42 pm
...is only what, 40 years old? Longer, maybe?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:40 pm
A week ago, not one single one of you had an issue with PBS. Today, because Dr. Oz decreed it from the pulpit, every last one of you hates PBS. But you're right, it must be the left who's brainwashed. I mean, the whole 'end big oil subsidy' argument...
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:39 pm
...wilfully disconnect the oil companies from having to do the same thing. You're simply shilling for these companies to keep stealing your tax dollars, while b***** the war drum, looking for big bird's head. Respectfully, you remind me of a sheep.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:37 pm
Actually, your definition is based entirely on your own interpretation of fact. What is dishonest is that you're arguing that PBS should be able to compete in the free market against ABC, CBS, etc..., without recieving taxpayer subsidies, but then you...
WTFO - October 8, 2012, 3:00 am
BTW, I looked and found that PBS gets about $450M annually. Here's the difference tax breaks are not the same as handouts. The govt can't claim that not taking peoples money is the same as spending our taxes. It's a dishonest argument from the start.
WTFO - October 8, 2012, 2:54 am
more to the story. These tax breaks are not specifically for oil companies. They are the same tax breaks EVERY business gets. http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/about_those_oil_subsidies.html. Another liberal myth blown up with facts.
WTFO - October 8, 2012, 2:53 am
Being the only one to comment on your poster is sad. Here, let me help your misguided attacks on Exxon. I did some research. The 'subsidies' everyone is talking about are not tax dollars being sent to oil (or Exxon), they are tax breaks. However, there is
crankyhead - October 7, 2012, 10:59 pm
Like Exxon. They get way more money from the taxpayer than PBS does. Not only that, Exxon is a corporation. And 'Corporations are people, my friend.', aren't they? Where's the ire and outrage for Exxon the welfare queen?
crankyhead - September 19, 2012, 12:28 am
Seriously, I made this a year ago. What're the odds?
crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


Liberal Hoplophobia -




Why Can't We Be Friends -




Peace Messengers -




ROBIN ROBERTS - Why did she get the gay scoop?




on the rocks & under water -




DOOMSDAY...BAD NEWS - the good news...no 4 more years of obama




OBAMA DRAMA - ending soon...and I approve this message




The main stream media has done its job well -




we're twins... -


TAGS: obie
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by posterman



RABID LIBERALS - They are like zombies, they want to eat your brains ...




OBAMA FOR POPE... - why not? infallible, 2 religions, controls massive wealth, doubted by millions...JD


TAGS: obie
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by posterman



ISLAMOPHOBIA IN AMERICA? - Yeah right, show me some proof.




obamafail -




Why does God... -


TAGS: pat robinson feminism hobby lobby
Rating: 3.7/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Bandit5906 - July 15, 2014, 11:21 pm
I'm sure he "talks" to many different people. Unfortunately they are not listening!
EmmaRoydes - July 15, 2014, 2:04 pm
Why do atheists quote Jesus, God, and the bible if they think all three are crap?


xenophobia disguised as a victory for secular rights -




ISLAMOPHOBIA - Some people shouldn't be allowed to reproduce.


TAGS: paranoid loons islamophobia
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Cannabal - March 27, 2013, 5:55 pm
Slip a Bible in their bathroom. That will sure make them s'hit.


PROUD TO BE LOUD -


TAGS: loud proud whopper homophobia
Rating: 3.33/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

EmmaRoydes - July 12, 2014, 10:57 pm
who got all upset about that in the first place?
fauxnews - July 12, 2014, 10:38 pm
LOL
Zeitguy - July 12, 2014, 10:10 pm
Absolutely, after you eat it you immediately regret it and say to yourself "never again". And then go watch Fox or MSNBC.


OBAMA ON UR TV SCREENS NOW - how do we Know he's lying?...easy! his lips are moving




Gitmo -




HEAL THYSELF - Homophobia can be cured.




Take your homophobia and shove it -


TAGS: homophobia
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - April 28, 2013, 5:55 pm
I think education is one of those things he calling societal decay
PapaFox - April 28, 2013, 5:51 pm
Most people on the left also value education. You might try it sometime - it's never too late.
Renza - April 28, 2013, 4:44 pm
Normal isn't typically an applicable term when it comes to generalizing humans. And to answer your question, it depends on how close minded of a view you have on the world.
ChadAllen - April 28, 2013, 4:20 pm
"Don't" expect me to call that normal I meant to say. The same with les***** (I don't care how h** they may be). So do those on the left actually believe in anything that doesn't require dead babies, queer love, & overall societal decay & degeneracy??
ChadAllen - April 28, 2013, 4:16 pm
So where exactly is the moral imperative again for me to be demanded to accept one guy looking at another guys hairy a$$ & seeing love & be expected to consider that normal? Go be queer all you want, no skin off my nose, but expect me to call that normal.


XENOPHOBIA - Because "people who aren't like us" are so scary.


TAGS: immigration vs xenophobia
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

ChadAllen - May 26, 2013, 2:51 pm
Only when they're blowing up children & adults in our streets, then they just need to be made "DEAD"!


HOMOPHOBIA? - Take that, suckers!


TAGS: homophobia
Rating: 2.23/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - March 1, 2013, 8:07 am
lol, that is an excellent response. ty for finding this.


"HOLY MITT, BATMAN!" - "We just lost this election!"




MENTAL ILLNESS - More common these days.


TAGS: mental obamaphobia
Rating: 1.93/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Cyberhagen - January 26, 2013, 1:41 pm
In this case, I think PF is commenting on the birthers more than the average gun owner.
PapaFox - January 25, 2013, 7:17 pm
Most gun owners I've known aren't stupid enough to fall for this type of conspiracy horsesh*t. Are you?
foxrecon19d - January 25, 2013, 7:11 pm
So this is your opinion on every law abiding citizen who owns a gun? Tell us again how you aren't brainwashed?


Liberal Stupidity -




Liberal Insanity -




Islam vs Islamist -


TAGS: islamophobia race card reality deniers
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - December 21, 2015, 5:45 pm
Dang, I need to proof read better. That first "to" should be "is".


we are wise to you -




Eurobia -




knee jerk reaction -




anecdotal evidence -




profiling and bigotry -


TAGS: bernadino conservaphobia doublethink hypocrisy nra
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - December 12, 2015, 7:34 pm
I noticed that error myself. I usually catch that error better when I make it.
Cyberhagen - December 12, 2015, 12:48 pm
*Their (ideological opponents) -just saying.


How to spot a Trump supporter. -




Batman's Thoughts on Hillary -




The Robinson Family's Impression Of Obama -




Trump 2016 -




the FOOL -


TAGS: trump star wars obi wan
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Bandit5906 - September 9, 2016, 12:09 am
vote#TrumpPence16


Alert: Nations Now Capable Of Using Online Photo Meme Makers To Launch Missiles anywhere -


TAGS: batman robin o reilly science deniers
Rating: 4.48/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:49 pm
BUMP http://i.imgur.com/IIqQu.gif


Derp -


TAGS: baltimore riots homophobia bill flores
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

calron - May 25, 2015, 9:12 pm
So you going to pretend to know things that you cannot and them talk about that instead of the subject. Seems like a repeating pattern with a certain group.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 17, 2015, 9:08 pm
http://a3.img.mobypicture.com/4b7a0410140ce2fbbaaa01aa9f520073_view.jpg
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:20 pm
NP ;-) http://tacitlabs.com/ebay/awaves/nopro.jpg
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 12:15 pm
Didn't see this until now :) Sorry doll.
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:10 pm
Already one step ahead of you ;-) See #76272
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 12:02 pm
Is anyone buying this?
fauxnews - May 16, 2015, 10:16 pm
Word of advice: It's not much of a game when we can see your hand ;-) lolololol...It's over, Calvon. We're not buying it. But please feel free to just keep trying to convince yourself. It's your time you are wasting, not ours.lol Cheers
calron - May 16, 2015, 9:00 pm
Opps, I mean rebeccaolsen likelt took the poster as fact without vetting it. And now refuses to admit that he might not have meant what rebeccaolsen says he did.
calron - May 16, 2015, 8:24 pm
I didn't message you.
calron - May 16, 2015, 8:21 pm
Took it as fact and likely didn't vet it.Both his arguments are basically Equivocation and he resorts to personal attacks rather than admit to the big section of the quote that was cut that changes the meaning quite a bit. That was my point you missed.
rebeccaolsen - May 10, 2015, 12:48 pm
#76055 :) http://ajournalofmusicalthings.com/wp-content/uploads/Aw-shucks.jpg
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:39 pm
...or move on to a subject you are more familiar with, like D&D. After experiencing a few of your CC "arguments" it is clear your expertise is "fantasy." ;-) Have a good one, mate. Cheers
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:22 pm
P.S. The truth is, Calvon, we are not sure if YOU UNDERSTAND "basic argumentation".lol..You had your a$s handed to you by Rebecca last week. If I had to go into why, then that really is just sad, mate. You really should learn to quit while you are behind.
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:17 pm
Also, while we're on the subject of your double standard, This - www.politifake.org/propaganda-climate-change-irony-politics-61745.html Wanna guess what Koch brother funded thinktank THIS "non-biased"(lol) picture came from? Rhymes with Fartland Institute
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:13 pm
Heaven forbid. You mean, Rebecca shared a parody picture from a parody website? lol..Also, the dem.website wasn’t the source of that quote. The congressman actually said those words.Much better evidence for it was the article YOU inadvertently posted X-p
rebeccaolsen - May 10, 2015, 11:49 am
Hun, that train left the station a week ago, along with any dignity you had left. Necroposting FTL
calron - May 10, 2015, 2:03 am
So basically you do not understand basic argumentative techniques like applying a premise to another subject to show that it is not sound, and of course, http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017262841
rebeccaolsen - May 6, 2015, 5:32 pm
Speaking from personal experience? :)
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 6, 2015, 4:37 pm
and, clearly, has nothing whatsoever to do with addiction to welfare and subsidized housing
DebtToAmerica - May 6, 2015, 3:11 am
"the baltimore riots are a result of too many black kids growing up without fathers... clearly, marijuana prohibition has had its intended effect!"
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 2:28 am
So, you're done now? :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:56 am
Go troll somewhere else, maybe reddit.com will enjoy your persecution complex.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:54 am
When you are bringing up "ice-cream" and "murder" and trying to incorporate million dollar words like "strawman" (which you clearly dont understand) in a debate that has nothing to do with ANY of those things,do u really expect anyone to take u seriously?
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:41 am
So plainly by these arguments that you never actually bothered to even acknowledge existed in favor of attacks and strawmanning he did not actually say what you claim he did.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:40 am
That he talked about what may happen in the future when stating that he was talking about the past. What he actually blamed was "the breakdown of the family" and then stated that redefining marriage (including g** marriage) would make it worse...
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:37 am
You never actually showed me wrong, rather you a**umed two different statements meant the same thing and attacked me and spammed your argument to back itself. As it is you still at blaming murders on ice cream sales because they are linked and ignoring...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:32 am
so sue me. :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:32 am
Not at all. Yes, there are only so many ways I can show you that you are wrong when you did ALL the work for me :) But watching your credibility self-destruct was fascinating in a train wreck sort of way,I couldn't look away.I have a morbid sense of humor
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:24 am
And in the place of reason we have the same old attack lines being spammed. In all your arguing in a circle rather than presenting anything valid.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:22 am
In all you "argument" shows a lack of the acknowledgement of the concept of fallibility, in which you debate in a big circle without realizing you are using a**uming you are right to prove it so.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:22 am
The mountain of excuses you're making and your contortionist level of spinning is far more embarrassing than your goof ever was :) Please,dont stop on my accord.It’s quite entertaining watching you do the denier dance.You're practically a whirling dervish
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:19 am
So you still going to a**ume that I didn't do something that I did actually do and then attack me for your own creation rather than what I have actually said. IUt proves to me how biased you really are, so you want some sause on that crow?
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:18 am
Ties like ice cream sales and murder rates means the same to you as blaming murders on ice cream sales. The fact that he spoke of possible future events means he was not speaking of past events, thus couldn't be blaming these riots on g** marriage.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:17 am
All your spamming and lame red-herrings in the world won't change that, hun. You embarrassed yourself...big time. More salt with your foot?
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:16 am
I can use the word "blames" if you like. It's not like I did something dumb like accidentally posted an article without reading it that actually made the case for my opponent here. Would hate to be that guy right now.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:14 am
actually says "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage." According to "basic debate", your evidence made my case for me. Ties, blames. What do I care? Splitting hairs.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:14 am
Nope, you moved the goal post from, "All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage." to "My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage". By basic argumentation...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:13 am
My argument is "Flores blames riots to g.ay marriage". You disagreed, saying "it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities," but offered as proof against it an article that doesn't say that at all. The proof you offered
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:11 am
actually says "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage." According to "basic debate", your evidence made my case for me. Instead of conceding a minor defeat, you are going for the big blow out. Thank you. I like to win big :)
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:11 am
"My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage"." Nope, you said "All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage." Moved Goal Post.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:10 am
"Mr. Perkins argued that the government is “the last stop to fix problems,” and that the major issues today can be traced back to “the breakdown of the family, which the redefinition of would only accelerate.”" Tied without causation. QED
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:09 am
My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage". You disagreed, saying "it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities," but offered as proof against it an article that doesn't say that at all. The proof you offered
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:08 am
d*** I suck as spell, he spoke of a possible future events rather that the riots, so you "blame" on what has happened contradicts statement directly.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:07 am
In the article the rep says“You look at what’s going on in Baltimore today, you know, you see the issues that are raised there.And healthy marriages are the ones between a man and a woman." The article's title itself is"Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage"
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:07 am
Your argumentum ad nauseam is not going to make your failed reasoning any more valid. You didn;t even get the order right as he said about what could happen in the further rather what already happened.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:05 am
and instead repeatedly attack me without bothering to address what I actually said in reb***al. I have tied ice cream sales to murder and if your argument is valid I must be saying that ice cream sales cause murder. As that is false so is your argument.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:03 am
The article wouldn't have the headline "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" if it was going then refute its own claim. You goofed up and are too proud to admit it
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:02 am
But you claiming a tie means a causal relationship, and my a***ogy shows that no it doesn't. And you have basically failed at even basic debate by saying that me challenging one of the required premises your argument is not a valid...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:00 am
when the article itself actually said "[The politician] ties the Riots to Ga.y Marriage." And you are too pathologically proud to admit it. So this ridiculous meltdown over it as you try to recover from that :) Please don't stop. It's quite amusing
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:59 am
But we are not speaking about ice-cream sales and murder here. That's a false a***ogy.Any high school debater will tell you that. We are speaking about a politician who tried to tie the riots to g.ay marriage and you offered an article as proof against it
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:54 am
Both ice cream sales and murders increase with temperature. So they are statistically tied together. That doesn't mean that ice cream sales are to blame for murders as a tie itself doesn't mean a causal relation.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:48 am
Nope, as by the quote from the article you ignored, he tied them without a causal link between the two, which you keep ignoring in favor of of spamming the same line over and over, or argumentum ad nauseam.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:43 am
One another note, when I see Rep arguments like this, I wonder if they are actually a closet homo***ual covering by being against the parts of themselves that they feel undue shame over.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:43 am
Again, I said, the congressman blames the riots on g.ay marriage. You offered as proof against that claim an article titled "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage” So the article is contradicting itself? Then why did you share it hun?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:42 am
"Mr. Perkins argued that the government is “the last stop to fix problems,” and that the major issues today can be traced back to “the breakdown of the family, which the redefinition of would only accelerate.”" Tied without causation. QED
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:39 am
And while you persist in saying those two statement means the same thing, you ignore the argument that they do not in favor of attacking over using reason, while pretending to know what I think.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:38 am
Nope, because they are two different statements which shows that you're actually beating a strawman that you refuse to let go of, unless of course you believe that ice cream sales cause murders because science tied them together statistically.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:37 am
Either you are too embarrassed to admit your goof up or suffer from some disorder that prevents you from seeing that. Either way, I'm just using your words and your article. If you don't like it, you might want to look in the mirror hun. He's to blame :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:35 am
All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage. You then posted an article with the headline "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" as proof against it, when clearly it is making my point for me.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:32 am
Science tied murder rates to ice cream sales, but that doesn't mean that one causes the other.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:31 am
Nope on both counts, still fake mind reading for the fail so you can avoid what I actually say in favor of spamming that attack b***on.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:29 am
neither the title nor the article say what you wish them to say, not am I "indict it"
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:28 am
I can practically see your red-face from here hun :) Sweating?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:27 am
So you once again pretend to know what I think and get it wrong to spam that attack b***on. He never once said that the riots where because of g** marriage and neither did I. You seem to be trying to twist the facts to match what you what to be true.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:27 am
Again, u shared this article. I didn't. Why would you share an article with the title "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" if you were just going to indict it? Maybe b/c the truth is you f*cked up and have to spin your way out?
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:24 am
Oh, I read the whole article child :) Now you are just lying to save face. Inside the article itself, Rep. Flores says,"And healthy marriages are the ones between a man and a woman." Flores also has a history speaking out on the subject of g.ay marriage.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:23 am
The irony is that it sounds like you are describing your usual line of "argumentation" whenever you make an error. Do you want a shovel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aciTdXoC8J8
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:19 am
Nope, I read the actual thing, you know past the headline. The headline doesn't say what you are saying it does, but you chose to ignore what I actually said on the article to spam the attack b***on yet again.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:19 am
Pathetic. You are bull****ting now and too committed to stop. I don't give a sh*t WHY he blamed g.ay marriage. All I said is: he did. You acknowledge it. So does the article you posted.Funny to watch you now DENY your own article, denier. BAD SPINNING FTL
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:16 am
Then why did you post it then, sweetie? :) Take a deep breath.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:15 am
So ts;cr? You said, "It is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities" yet the article's headline is: "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g** marriage" So you are indicting your own article you posted?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:13 am
Isn't funny how you a**ume what I did and spam that attack b***on. :P Try reading past the headline. Now how do you like you crow :)
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:12 am
But if you read the actual article, he is saying the g** marriage would make it worse, rather than blaming it on g** marriage. Thus he is baiting his followers with some red meat, rather than doing what you claim.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:11 am
Salt with your foot FTW :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:11 am
Then there is the article's headline -"GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g** marriage, ‘breakdown of the family’" You said, "Looks like I was right." Between all the bu.tton mashing and your meltdown, forgot to read your article hun? :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:09 am
First line of that article you posted - "Texas Republican Rep. Bill Flores suggested Tuesday that the ongoing unrest in Baltimore is largely due to the “breakdown of the family,” which he tied to the legalization of g** MARRIAGE.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:06 am
Looks like I was right, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/30/bill-flores-gop-lawmaker-ties-baltimore-riots-to-g/ :P
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:01 am
ts;dc :)
calron - May 3, 2015, 11:53 pm
If there's not more to that quote than you supplied, then I would likely say it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities, with some baiting thrown in.


Republicans and their Lies. -




Republican Science Deniers -




Republican Christian Extremism -


TAGS: homophobia indiana religious freedom law
Rating: 2.03/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

rebeccaolsen - May 31, 2015, 8:31 pm
That is like saying Christians hate the skin color, not the person, or Christians hate the Judaism, not the Jew - both things the church also condemned at one point. Who needs evidence when we have you :)
OTC - May 31, 2015, 5:37 pm
Here's another point where you're wrong, christians hate the sin, not the person. Obviously, liberal colleges teach the opposite
OTC - March 31, 2015, 6:28 pm
And nothing says that more than defending one group if people by demonizing another group of people
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 5:11 pm
I knew what you were saying in your #sarcasmfail.But even a clock that is broken is right twice a day.Despite both #sarcasmfails,I enjoyed your two inadvertently correct statements(about natural consequences for ignorance).There is your "two" for today:)
Curlyrocks - March 31, 2015, 4:54 pm
Oh right, scientists said something complicated that most people don't understand so it must mean the doomsday is coming and it's all the fault of people we don't like or understand.
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 4:51 pm
:)
Curlyrocks - March 31, 2015, 4:47 pm
Nothing dumber than thinking an all powerful force such as a god would cause some huge wrath and punish people for their lifestyle choices. So why is it so hard to believe that the earth isn't going to burn us all for our energy wasting lifestyle?


Holy DERP, Batman! -




Veracity -




Islamophobia-phobia -




Remember kids, whatever you do...don't break your favorite toys! -




PREV PAGE